Skip to content

Software quality, AI evaluation & architecture advisory

Assess software quality and compare technical options

Assess software quality and AI or agent performance, compare technologies and review architecture. Use the findings for outsourced delivery acceptance, technical due diligence, vendor comparisons and a phased improvement roadmap.

ASCEND / BUSINESS EXPERIENCEILLUSTRATIVE
One environment for your team
TEAM / CUSTOMERS / PARTNERS
Internal tools
Knowledge & AI
Business data
LOCAL / CLOUD / HYBRID

Shaped around your data and the way you work

ACCESS · RELEASES · HANDOVER
BUILT AROUND THE WORK

When this service fits

When you need to accept software, compare AI or review architecture

Identify the system, representative business tasks and available materials, then agree the assessment scope and criteria.

  • You need to accept an external delivery
  • AI demonstrations are hard to compare
  • Architecture choices affect long-term cost

TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES & SCOPE

What the engineering covers

Choose methods to fit your existing equipment, systems and project requirements.

Software quality & AI/agent evaluation

Use a repeatable evaluation protocol with retained evidence, so findings can be inspected and compared rather than accepted on trust.

  • Code quality, architecture, automated test coverage, performance and security baselines
  • Delivery-process maturity and quality-gate assessment
  • Same-task comparisons across models and agents on quality, speed, cost and failure rate
  • Customer business tasks, reproducible test material and retained raw evidence

Technology selection & architecture review

Compare credible candidates against business constraints, integration requirements and long-term operating responsibility.

  • Identity, gateways, data, storage and observability candidate comparisons
  • Scenario-based fit, total cost, migration effort and vendor dependence
  • Review of system boundaries, growth constraints and operational readiness
  • Prioritized architecture evolution with near-term and later-stage decisions

DELIVERABLES

What you receive

Agree the deliverables and acceptance criteria before work starts.

Reproducible assessment report

Scope, method, evidence, findings, severity and practical remediation priorities.

AI comparison scorecard

Task-level quality, timing, cost and failure results with original evaluation records.

Selection and architecture report

Candidate comparisons, fit analysis, tradeoffs and recommended decisions.

Evolution and acceptance roadmap

Phased actions, verification criteria and a review session with your team.

Implementation and handover

Review the working result at each stage before agreeing further work.

  1. Agree materials and scope

    Review code, system documentation, business tasks and operating constraints. Agree what will be assessed and how the work will be accepted.

  2. Evaluate and compare

    Assess software and architecture using the agreed methods. Compare AI on the same tasks, retain test conditions and raw records, and review findings at milestones.

  3. Review findings and priorities

    Deliver methods, evidence, findings and recommendations. Agree priorities, follow-up decisions and who is responsible.

DEPLOYMENT & HANDOVER

Deployment, handover and ongoing responsibilities

Private delivery and existing identities

Deliver into the agreed customer environment, with AD / LDAP / OIDC integration where required. Define data migration, staged transition and any external-service dependencies before implementation.

Source-level assets and independent operation

For development work, hand over source, dependencies, deployment configuration, CI/CD definitions, interface/data documentation and operating guides. Usage, redevelopment rights and independent-build acceptance are agreed in the contract.

ACCEPTANCE

Agree what completion means

  • Findings are connected to reproducible evidence and the agreed assessment scope.
  • AI candidates use the same business task set and a documented scoring method.
  • Selection recommendations state constraints and meaningful tradeoffs.
  • The roadmap identifies owners, priorities and criteria for confirming improvement.
Discuss your acceptance criteria

BEFORE WE START

A few practical questions

Can you assess only part of the software or AI system?

Yes. Software checks, AI evaluation, technology selection and architecture reviews can be scoped separately. Agree required materials, dependencies and other teams’ responsibilities first. Follow-up development or handover can also be arranged separately.

How are cost, timing and performance targets agreed?

Review the existing environment and representative tasks first. Then agree milestones, expected scale, acceptance criteria and exclusions. Cost, timing and performance targets depend on that scope and the test conditions.

EXPLORE THE NEXT STEP

Discuss your project

Discuss your needs